IamWillyWonkaa    About    Archive    Images    RFN    Twitter    Feed

the gay pill (Deluxe Edition)

alt text

Is homosexuality immoral?

I find homosexuality disturbing and repulsive but is there any secular justification for finding it immoral or a rational reason to hate it besides “muh feels”?

So you’re after a non-religious reason to hate faggots? Sure thing.

Degenerates and liberals will take you on a wild chase through fallacious logic and appeals to emotion, but at the end of the day, the truth has always been our very first thought as children when we saw gays.


Errors occur in nature all the time - and homosexuality is a perfect example of error. Somewhere in the brain of every homosexual, a critical error has occurred. In what other situation is an error encouraged or rewarded as it is in homosexuality in today’s media? You may ask yourself how this error affects you. The answer is simple. Homosexuality, despite what you are told to believe, can be indoctrinated. Why do you think the rate of children who ‘turn out” gay skyrockets in the presence of gay “parents”?

Let us dissect the delusional phrase, “homosexuality is not a choice.”

First, we must establish some axioms and definitions.

With these laid down, what follows is all possible propositions.

If (1): One engages in homosexual activity either A) voluntarily or B) involuntarily,

If (2): One desires homosexuality either A) innately or a) habitually,

If (3): One either chooses to be homosexual or homosexuality is a mental illness.

Therefore, homosexuals are mentally ill if and only if they do not choose to be homosexual and are not physically compelled by another to engage in homosexual activities. However, that is not the end of the discussion. Homosexuality, as a group of behaviors, is inherently self-destructive and causes self-harm. Homosexuality, as a group of behaviors, is statistically one of the most self-harmful. Willful pursuit or practice of a behavior—or group of behaviors—that is inherently self-harmful is mental illness.


Marriage as a government institution is designed to incentivize childbirth and attempt to ensure that children (future citizens) are raised in the most stable environment possible—that being a two parent, mother and father, household. This is because all studies of marriage and familial relationship through thousands of years of recorded human history prove said environment is the most nurturing and stable. As a government institution, gays have no clam to being recognized—nor is it unfairly discriminatory—since it seeks to create an outcome which gays simply cannot provide.

Marriage as a religious institution is defined by the parameters of that religion. Christian doctrine, for example, says gays cannot marry. Thus, they cannot, when considering marriage as a religious institution. This applies to any religion that does or does not allow gay marriage.

Marriage as a social institution merely proclaims mutual love between two people. This is unregulated and unaffected by legal institution. Anyone can say they’re married to anyq)ne as long as the other party is consenting. Essentially, gay marriage seeks to turn the institution into a purely social union, since government subsidized gay marriage is a tax drain. This will have cultural and societal implications once marriage is devalued. Regarding marriage itself, the institution is not a human right. Nor is it definitionally an all-inclusive bastion of equality.

See above for its definitions. Equality of race, an equally incorrect concept, does not imply that a caucasoid could claim to be an Australian aborigine to reap the benefits of assistance programs for aboriginal groups. Nor is marriage discrimination. The creation ofa definition for a word in no way intends persecution of things to which the word does not apply.

The slippery slope fallacy is often brought up, by gays, as a means by which to discredit the belief that •normalizing” homosexual relationships will lead to the •normalization” of other universally incorrect behaviors. Those who oppose gay marriage are often called ‘bigots’ (without regard for the definition of the word), but those who oppose polygamy, incest, and pedophilia (even ephebophilia) are well within their rights todo so. Those who support these things are ‘crazy’ and even ‘mentally ill’ , just as gays were until a vote in 1970 ignored the science of their affictlon and removed them from the DSM_ aut If we are allowing gay marriage to be seen as ‘normal”, what right do gays have to restrict polygamists, incestuals, and pedophiles from receiving the same ‘equality”?

Homosexuals use appeals to emotion

Homosexuals also use appeals to emotion in claiming they are to be forcibly made equal. The argument that gays cannot see their ‘partners’ in hospitals as they are not recognized as family is one of these examples. aut if a hotel banned female patrons from entering, it would not be the job of the government to redefine the word ‘women’ to mean ‘men’ so that they could enter. Nor is it the job of the government to change the hospital’s policy. In a free market society, it is the job of the collective mind of the patrons of the hospital to agree or disagree with its policies, choosing another facility if the latter.

Homosexuals denounce marriage as a failed institution due to a high rate of divorce and other problems. Leaving the cause of the rise of such problems for another discussion, why would any sane individual, acknowledging and repeating said statistics and probabilities regarding marriage, still demand to be a part of said institution? Additionally, if marriage is increasingly deviating from its original meaning, why would you desire to implement further perversion of that meaning?

‘Marriage’ has been distorted and watered down, therefore we should further distort and water down marriage?

We all know know how rabies works.

An infected animal becomes more aggressive prior to death. It will end up biting other animals to spread the infection along. This is an example of a behavior-modifying organism.

What probably dont know is that there are hundreds of other organisms that also affect behavior. A Virus causes caterpillars to climb up trees. Then it liquifies their organs so the body disintegrates and the Virus can be spread by the wind.[1]

There is a STD for grasshoppers that makes them more sexually active.[2]

In the days prior to experiencing the symptoms of the flu, the Virus Will make more sociable so can transmit it more. [3]

Here’s the real kicker though: There is a parasite that has the ability to modify sexual preference. Toxoplasma gondii_ Youse probably heard of T. gondli as the amoeba that infects cats. There’s a lot more to it than that. Rats are a carrier of T. gondii_ When infected, a rat will be attracted to cat urine, making it more likely to be eaten by a cat, the intended host. How does it work? Toxoplasma alters the brain to make the rat sexually attracted to cat urine. [4] Toxoplasma’s ability to make rats sexually attracted persists even after the rat is no longer infected. [4.1] That’s right- a parasite has the ability to PERMANENTLY ALTER SEXUAL PREFERENCE in its host. Dig deeper into the facts behind T. gondii and we see: 1/3 of all humans are chronic carriers of toxoplasma. [5] Males with toxoplasma are taller and have more attractive faces (Allowing you to have more sax and spread the virus further). [5] Toxoplasmosis increases the concentration of dopamine in the brain of infected humans (You become more likely to do risky, thrill-seeking behavior). [6] Toxoplasma immunoglobulins are found in 9% of newborns in the US (Hmm, where have we seen this figure before… Oh, right—it’s same figure claimed as the percentage of homosexuals in the US). [9] Toxoplasma transfers from pregnant woman to their baby.[7] Toxoplasma infected women have male sons 72% of the time. [8]

If havent pieced together the facts yet, I’ll fill in. Toxoplasma infects the fetus of pregnant mothers, making the baby more likely to be male and permanently altering the baby’s brain to create sexual attraction to men. Youse probably heard the false “genetic hypothesis” that claims that female siblings of gay men have more babies, meaning that gayness must be an advantage. Well, the sexual attraction to men. Youse probably heard the false “genetic hypothesis” that claims that female siblings of gay men have more babies, meaning that gayness must be an advantage. The “gay gene” has been disproven, but toxoplasma explains why the sisters are having more babies. The same toxoplasma that altered their brother’s brain altered their brain to increase their sexual attraction to men. Homosexual men are having more sax than their heterosexual counterparts, spreading toxoplasma further. Use HIV as a proxy for how effective homosexual behavior is at transmitting disease: homosexuals are 10% of the population but account for 60% of new HIV cases.

In response to homosexuality, homosexual disgust (aka “homophobia”) has evolved as a means to avoid toxoplasma infection. The purpose of disgust is disease avoidance. [10] You are disgusted at the sight offeces because feces has a lot of bacteria. You didnt need to learn to avoid feces; it’s just genetic. Similarly, homophobia was found to be genetic, and also present in nearly half the population. [11] This means that homophobia evolved because it increases your darwlnian fitness by helping you avoid toxoplasma.




[4] https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023277

[4.1] https://news.berkeley.edu/2013/09/18/toxoplasma-infection-permanently-shifts-balance-in-cat-and-mouse-game/

[5] http://jeb.biologists.org/content/216/1/127

[6] https://www.theguardian.com/science/2006/oct/12/uk.health

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxoplasmosis

[8] https://www.theguardian.com/science/2006/oct/12/uk.health




Many homosexuals dont pay heed to warnings of their lifestyles: “Knowledge of health guidelines was quite high, but this knowledge had no relation to sexual behavior” (16).

Homosexuals got homosexuality removed from the list of mental illnesses in the early 70s by storming the annual American Psychiatric Association (APA) conference on successive years. “Guerrilla theater tactics and more straight-forward shouting matches characterized their presence” Since homosexuality has been removed from the APA list of mental illnesses, so has pedophilia (except when the adult feels “subjective distress”) (27).

Homosexuals live unhealthy lifestyles, and have historically accounted for the bulk of syphilis, gonorrhea, Hepatitis a, the “gay bowel syndrome” (which attacks the intestinal tract), tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus (27).

73% of psychiatrists say homosexuals are less happy than the average person, and of those psychiatrists, 70% say that the unhappiness is NOT due to social stigmatization (13).

26-33% of homosexuals and lesbians are alcoholics (11).

Of homosexuals questioned in one study reports that 43% admit to 600 or more partners in a lifetime, 28% admit to 1000 or more in a lifetime, and of these people, 79% say that half of those partners are total strangers, and 70% of those sexual contacts are one night stands (or, as one homosexual admits in the film ‘The Castro”, one minute stands) (3). Also, it is a favorite past-time of many homosexuals to go to ‘cruisey areas” and have anonymous sex

For other psychiatrists who believe that homosexuality is wrong, please see National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality. It takes approximately $300,000 to take care of each AIDS victim, so thanks to the promiscuous lifestyle of homosexuals, medical insurance rates have been skyrocketing for all of us (10).

Homosexuals were responsible for spreading AIDS in the United States, and then raised up violent groups like Act Up and Ground Zero to complain about it. Even today, homosexuals account for well over 60% of the AIDS cases in the United States, which is quite a large number considering that they account for less than 1% of the population. Homosexuals account for a disproportionate number of hepatitis cases: 70-80% in San Francisco, 29% in Denver, 66% in New York City, 66% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal, and 26% in Melbourne

##33% of homosexuals admit to fisting (inserting the hand, sometimes part of the arm, into the rectum of his partner). (7)

17% of homosexuals eat and/or rub the feces of their partners on themselves. (4) 12% of homosexuals give/receive enemas as part of sexual pleasure. (4) In one study, the average homosexual fellated somewhere between 20 and 106 men, swallowed 60 seminal discharges, had 72 penile penetrations of the anus, and ingested feces of 23 different men EVERY YEAR (6)

Of homosexuals questioned in one study, 43% admitted to 600 or more partners in a lifetime, 28% admitted to 1000 or more in a lifetime, and of these people, 79% said that half of those partners were total strangers, and 70% of those sexual contacts were one night stands (or, as one homosexual admits in the film •The Castro,” one minute stands). (3) Also, it is a favorite past-time of many homosexuals to go to •cruisy areas” and have anonymous sex. See wwwcruisingforsex.com (NOTE this site may contain pornographic images - please dont go to it if you are under age or dont want to see this type of material. This site is referenced only for illustrative purposes.)

Because homosexuals cant reproduce naturally, they resort to recruiting children. Homosexuals can be heard chanting ‘TEN PERCENT IS NOT ENOUGH, RECRUIT, RECRUIT RECRUIT’ in their homosexual parades. A group called the “Lesbian Avengers” prides itself on trying to recruit young girls. They print “WE RECRUIT’ on their literature. Some other homosexuals arent as overt about this, but rather try to infiltrate society and get into positions where they will have access to the malleable minds of young children (e.g., the clergy, teachers, Boy Scout leaders, etc.) (8). See the DC Lesbian Avengers web page, and DC Lesbian Avengers Press Release, where they threaten to recruit little boys and girls. Also, see AFA Action Alert.


(1) Advocate, 1986

(2) Bayer, R. Homosexuality and American Psychiatry.

(3) dell, A. and Weinberg, M. Homosexualities: a Study of Diversity Among Men and Women. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978.

(4) Cameron et_ al. ISIS National Random Sexuality Survey. Nebraska Med. Journal, 1986, 70, pp. 292-299. (5) “Changes in Sexual Behavior and Incidence of Gonorrhea.” Lancet, April 26, 1987.

(6) Corey, L _ and Holmes, K. “Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men.” New EnglandJ_ Med. , 1980, pp. 436-38.

(7) Family Research Institute, Lincoln, NE

(8) Fields, Dr. E. “Is Homosexual Activity Norma17’ Marietta, GA.

(9) Jay and Young. The Gay Report. Summit Books, 1979, p. 276.

(10) Kaifetz, J. “Homosexual Rights Are Concern for Some,” Post-Tribune, 18 December 1992.

(11) Kus, R. “Alcoholics Anonymous and Gay America.” Medical Journal of Homosexuality, 1987, 14(2), p. 264.

(12) Lesbian News, January 1994.

(13) Lief, H. Sexual Survey Number 4: Current Thinking on Homosexuality, Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 1977, pp. 110-11

(14) Manlight, G. et_ al. “Chronic Immune Stimulation ay Sperm Alloantigens_” J. American lied. Assn., 1984, 261(2), pp. 237-438.

(15) Morton-Hunt Study for Playboy

(16) MsKusick, L _ et_ al. “AIDS and Sexual Behavior Reported ay Gay Men in San Francisco.” Am. J. Pub. Health, 1986, 76, pp. Newsweek, February 1993.

(17) Newsweek, February 1993.

(18) Newsweek, 4 October 1993.

(19) Psychological Reports, 1986, 68, pp. 327-37.

(20) Rueda, E. The Homosexual Network. Old Greenwich, Conn_, The Devin Adair Company, 1982, p. 63. (21) San Francisco AIDS Foundation, “Can We Talk.”

(22) San Francisco Sentinel, 27 March 1992.

(23) Science Magazine, 18 July 1993, p. 322.

(24) Statistical Abstract of the U_S_, 1990.

(25) The Overhauling of Straight America.” Guide Magazine. November, 1987 _

(26) United States Census Bureau

(27) United States Congressional Record, June 29, 1989. (28) University of Chicago’s Nation Research Corp.

(29) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

(30) Reuters, Feb. 6, 2001(32) Associated Press, April 26, 2001